Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJulia, Sloth-Nielsen
dc.contributor.authorChristina, Murray
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-05T13:26:06Z
dc.date.available2019-12-05T13:26:06Z
dc.date.issued1989
dc.identifier.citationSloth-Nielsen, J & Murray, C. 1989. The death penalty in the Cape Provincial Division: 1986-1988. South African Journal on Human Rights. 5, 154-182en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/5094
dc.description.abstractThis article presents the data that we collected in four tables. These are explained in the first section below. The second part of the article examines three issues that emerge from the data. First, we note the disparity in the use of the death penalty by individual judges and argue that, in part at least, this must be attributed to the personal disposition of judges. Then we examine the figures relating to appeal procedures and conclude that the procedure should be reformed. Thirdly we comment on the reprieve process. The last section of the article suggests areas in which future research on the death penalty may fruitfully be conducted.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSouth African Journal on Human Rightsen_US
dc.subjectDeath penaltyen_US
dc.subjectPolitical trialsen_US
dc.subjectLeave to appealen_US
dc.subjectReprievesen_US
dc.subjectDiscretion in convictionen_US
dc.titleThe death penalty in the Cape Provincial Division: 1986-1988en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record