Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNjoko, Thulisile Brenda
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-03T08:04:21Z
dc.date.available2022-05-03T08:04:21Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationNjoko, Thulisile Brenda ‘The admissibility of criminal findings in civil matters: Re-evaluating the Hollington judgment’ De Jure 54:1 (2021) pp. 160–173en_US
dc.identifier.issn2225-7160
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2021/v54a10
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/7338
dc.description.abstractIn Hollington v Hewthorn & Co Ltd 2 1943 All ER 35 it was held that a finding of a criminal court did not have any probative value in a subsequent civil action and was inadmissible as evidence. Despite the case being one of English origin, the South African courts have largely adopted this ruling as one grounded in our common law. In this paper, the judgment in the Hollington case is critically analysed in order to determine its continued applicability in the face of South Africa's existing law of evidence and the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 ("the Constitution"). It is argued that in light of the existing law, this rule no longer finds application in South Africa.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPretoria University Law Pressen_US
dc.subjectCriminal findingsen_US
dc.subjectHollington judgmenten_US
dc.subjectCriminal courten_US
dc.subjectThe Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996en_US
dc.subjectCivil caseen_US
dc.subjectCivil lawen_US
dc.titleThe admissibility of criminal findings in civil matters: Re-evaluating the Hollington judgmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record