dc.contributor.author | Chenwi, Lilian | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-07T05:47:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-07T05:47:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Chenwi, L. (2014). 'Universal jurisdiction and South Africa's perspective on the investigation of international crimes'. South African Law Journal, 131( 1): 27 - 45 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10566/4941 | |
dc.description.abstract | Universal jurisdiction is an important yet contentious jurisdictional principle in international law, despite more than 100 states worldwide having universal jurisdiction legislation (Amnesty International Universal Jurisdiction: A Preliminary Survey of Legislation Around the World (2012) 1-2). The principle has dominated discussions at both the international and African regional levels, with many voicing practical, political and policy concerns with regard to its application. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | South African Law Journal | en_US |
dc.subject | Universal jurisdiction | en_US |
dc.subject | International crimes | en_US |
dc.subject | Domestic law | en_US |
dc.subject | International Criminal Court | en_US |
dc.title | Universal jurisdiction and South Africa's perspective on the investigation of international crimes | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |