Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRajkaran, Anusha
dc.contributor.authorSievers, Michael
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Christopher J.
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-22T14:05:17Z
dc.date.available2021-09-22T14:05:17Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationSievers, M., Brown, C. J., Buelow, C. A., Pearson, R. M., Turschwell, M. P., Fernanda Adame, M., Griffiths, L., Holgate, B., Rayner, T. S., Tulloch, V. J., Roy Chowdhury, M., Zu Ermgassen, P. S., Yip Lee, S., Lillebø, A. I., Mackey, B., Maxwell, P. S., Rajkaran, A., Sousa, A. I., & Connolly, R. M. (2021). Global typologies of coastal wetland status to inform conservation and management. Ecological Indicators, 131, 108141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108141en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108141
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/6776
dc.description.abstractGlobal-scale conservation initiatives and policy instruments rely on ecosystem indicators to track progress towards targets and objectives. A deeper understanding of indicator interrelationships would benefit these efforts and help characterize ecosystem status. We study interrelationships among 34 indicators for mangroves, saltmarsh, and seagrass ecosystems, and develop data-driven, spatially explicit typologies of coastal wetland status at a global scale. After accounting for environmental covariates and gap-filling missing data, we obtained two levels of clustering at 5 and 18 typologies, providing outputs at different scales for different end users. We generated 2,845 cells (1° (lat) × 1° (long)) globally, of which 29.7% were characterized by high land- and marine-based impacts and a high proportion of threatened species, 13.5% by high climate-based impacts, and 9.6% were refuges with lower impacts, high fish density and a low proportion of threatened species. We identify instances where specific actions could have positive outcomes for coastal wetlands across regions facing similar issues. For example, land- and marine-based threats to coastal wetlands were associated with ecological structure and function indicators, suggesting that reducing these threats may reduce habitat degradation and threats to species persistence. However, several interdimensional relationships might be affected by temporal or spatial mismatches in data. Weak relationships mean that global biodiversity maps that categorize areas by single indicators (such as threats or trends in habitat size) may not be representative of changes in other indicators (e.g., ecosystem function). By simplifying the complex global mosaic of coastal wetland status and identifying regions with similar issues that could benefit from knowledge exchange across national boundaries, we help set the scene for globally and regionally coordinated conservation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEcological Indicatorsen_US
dc.subjectbioregionen_US
dc.subjectcumulative impactsen_US
dc.subjectenvironmental managementen_US
dc.subjectglobal conservationen_US
dc.subjecthuman pressuresen_US
dc.subjecthealth indexen_US
dc.titleGlobal typologies of coastal wetland status to inform conservation and managementen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record