Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKinney, M.V
dc.contributor.authorKC, A
dc.contributor.authorLawn, J.E
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-03T08:05:29Z
dc.date.available2021-06-03T08:05:29Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationKinney, M.V. et al. (2021). Effect of COVID-19 on maternal and neonatal services – Authors' reply. The Lancet Global Health, 9(2), e116en_US
dc.identifier.issn2214109X
dc.identifier.uri10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30486-1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/6244
dc.description.abstractWe thank Asma Khalil and colleagues, Jogender Kumar, and Deepak Jha and colleagues for their feedback in response to our analysis on the indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in Nepal on intrapartum care and outcomes (preterm births, stillbirths, and neonatal mortality).1 As noted by Khalil and colleagues, our study underestimated the true burden of stillbirths because the data are facility-based and we excluded women who did not have a fetal heart sound at admission and women with an antepartum stillbirth occurring before admission. Although we included stillbirths that occurred after admission, the data were not disaggregated by time of stillbirth. In Nepal, gestational age estimation is commonly based on the last menstrual period, with few women having ultrasonography-dated pregnancy. We are doing additional research now on antenatal care and associated factors.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectCovid-19en_US
dc.subjectLockdownen_US
dc.subjectMaternal and neonatal servicesen_US
dc.subjectNepalen_US
dc.subjectIntrapartum careen_US
dc.titleEffect of COVID-19 on maternal and neonatal services – Authors' replyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record