Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShallcross, D.E
dc.contributor.authorKhan, M.A.H
dc.contributor.authorDennis, J.W
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-15T09:02:25Z
dc.date.available2021-04-15T09:02:25Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationShallcross, D.E. (2021). Tropospheric modeling of acetic acid in the UK for summer, winter and spring seasons using a mesoscale 3-dimensional chemistry and transport model, WRF-Chem-CR. Atmospheric Research, 254,105506en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-8095
dc.identifier.uri10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105506
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/6039
dc.description.abstractThe measurement of acetic acid during the ClearfLo campaign for Winter 2012 and Summer 2012 in London and at the Weybourne Research Station (East Anglia), UK for Spring 2013 gives the average ± 1σ mixing ratios of 45.9 ± 31.5, 25.7 ± 14.3 and 55.1 ± 32.0 ppt, respectively. The WRF-Chem-CRI model was run over these three seasons and within uncertainty reproduced the data from London, with mixing ratios during Winter (32.3 ± 25.3 ppt) and Summer (55.1 ± 22.6 ppt). The model's seasonality was opposite to that observed and although within the combined uncertainty of the measurement and model data it underpredicted the levels observed at Weybourne during Spring (28.9 ± 19.3 ppt). The model-measurement correlations of the meteorological parameters (e.g. temperature, wind direction, wind speed) were good with a correlation of R > 0.7. The predicted diurnal trend of acetic acid resembled measurement data with a small negative bias during winter but performed less well during summer with a large positive bias and in spring with a large negative bias. The reasonable correlation of acetic acid mixing ratios with temperature was found to be similar for both measurement and model (Rmeasurement = 0.5, Rmodel = 0.6) during Summer suggesting the importance of the photochemical secondary source of acetic acid which was reflected both in the measurement and the model. The key processes identified from the model results were a) missing direct anthropogenic sources of acetic acid (accounting for the lower model winter values) and b) not including its loss process by Criegee intermediates (accounting for the higher model values in summer). Comparing the weekend data with weekday data revealed a likely underpredicted source of acetic acid from vehicles. The wet deposition removal process of acetic acid was found not to be as significant in the UK as anticipated.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectAnthropogenic sourcesen_US
dc.subjectCriegee intermediatesen_US
dc.subjectDiurnal trenden_US
dc.subjectMeteorological parametersen_US
dc.subjectSeasonal variationen_US
dc.subjectWet depositionen_US
dc.titleTropospheric modeling of acetic acid in the UK for summer, winter and spring seasons using a mesoscale 3-dimensional chemistry and transport model, WRF-Chem-CRIen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record